March 19, 2026

USCIS and E-Verify have published coordinated employer guidance confirming how to handle I-9 and E-Verify compliance for current Temporary Protected Status (TPS) beneficiaries.

TPS for Burma, Ethiopia, Haiti, Somalia, South Sudan, Syria

Federal courts in Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, and the District of Columbia have stayed, or paused, the planned termination of Burma, Ethiopia, Haiti, Somalia, South Sudan and Syria’s TPS.

TPS for the six countries was slated to end on the following dates:

  1. Nov. 21, 2025 – Syria
  2. Jan. 5, 2026 – South Sudan
  3. Jan. 26, 2026 – Burma
  4. Feb. 3, 2026 – Haiti
  5. Feb. 13, 2026 – Ethiopia
  6. March 17, 2026 – Somalia

The court stays preserve TPS protections and work authorization for Burmese, Ethiopian, Haitian, Somalian, South Sudanese, and Syrian TPS holders while litigation continues.

Form I-9

The guidance directs employers to complete Section 1 and Section 2 on I-9s as follows:

New Hire Instructions:

Existing Employee Instructions:

These updates apply even if the EAD shows an earlier printed expiration date. The court orders extend validity through the new respective dates. Do not ask employees for updated documents unless a final court determination or new DHS or USCIS guidance changes the situation.

Employers may attach a printed copy of the USCIS Alert (see Burma AlertEthiopia AlertHaiti AlertSomalia AlertSouth Sudan Alert, and Syria Alert) and the country-specific TPS page (see TPS Burma pageTPS Ethiopia pageTPS Haiti pageTPS Somalia page, TPS South Sudan page, and TPS Syria page) to the I-9 file for documentation.

E-Verify

The E-Verify updates (see BurmaEthiopiaHaitiSomaliaSouth Sudan, and Syria) echo the I-9 approach for new hires:

Do not run a second E-Verify for existing employees.

Practical Compliance Tips for HR Teams

As Burmese, Ethiopian, Haitian, Somalian, South Sudanese, and Syrian TPS holders remain work authorized, employers must update existing I-9s and E-Verify cases according to the court and agency guidance — not revert to the old expiration dates printed on EADs. Proper notation and documentation now will help avoid compliance gaps if the legal landscape shifts later due to the litigation.