May 5, 2026

Africa and The World

By Dawit W Giorgis 

Introduction 

The shift from a “rules-based” global order to a “might is right” self-ordained power  that affects the entire world is the most severe challenge the global South, and  particularly Africa, faces today. While many African leaders, scholars, and  politicians have criticized the manner in which the existing rules-based order was  founded, the emerging new system, designed by the few powerful, is worse. It is  discriminatory, non-judicious, and exclusionary, and characterized by raw power  and unilateralism. It presents unprecedented challenges to Sub-Saharan Africa in  particular. (1) With the failure of multilateralism, the inability to enforce decisions  of the ICJ, ICC, resolutions of the UN, violations of the UN to provide humanitarian  assistance, to stop atrocities, human rights violations, wars across Africa and the  Middle East, is the clearest manifestation of the collapse of the rule-based  international order. The exchange of international law to a world of “might makes  right” will likely return Africa to the days of the scramble for Africa through a  strategy where Africa’s sovereignty is ignored to advance the strategic, labor,  resource, and consumer needs of global powers. There will be no legal or other  means to deter the unbridled plundering through asymmetric threats, imposed land  and resource deals, economic pressure, and eventually transform African states into  full-blown neo-colonies. The traditional values and spiritual restraints that once held  our communities together are being bulldozed by a global order where might creates  right, and souls are traded for property. Africa needs to wake up now, while its  marginalization is out in the open. If we don’t, we have truly lost our minds. We are  losing the game. But if we say ‘No’ and rise, refuse to live only for today’s needs,  we can secure a destiny in which the next generation finally owns their pride and  true independence. 

Being Black

It is generally understood that Africa is the “Cradle of Humanity. Back then, there  were no black people, just peopleBlack was never a color, but the origin of all  colors. 

“As any rainbow will demonstrate, black isn’t on the visible spectrum of color.  All other colors are reflections of light, except black. Black is the absence of  light. Unlike white and other hues, pure black can exist in nature without any  light at all.” (2) While science defines black as the absence of light or the  absorption of all colors, the view emphasizes black as foundational, creative,  and powerful, ” mother of all colors.” It is used as a neutral pigment that, when  added to others, provides depth, contrast, and intensity. (3) 

The history of Black people is the history of the world. African history in the  framework of the colonial era is, as Atlantis Browder wrote, ‘like judging a 1,000- page book by its last five pages,” or to refer to African history in two parts: colonial  and pre-colonial. Africa was there before Europe and America, and therefore, its  history should be integrated realistically into one wholesome civilization. The  colonial approach centers the European experience and treats thousands of years of  complex African development as a mere ‘prologue’ to the arrival of  outsiders. Attitudes remain entrenched in post-colonial Africa, and Afrocentric  focus on Africa is defined only by an unrealistic categorization of the continent into  two historical time frames, Colonial and Pre-colonialby what it is and not by what  it was and what it had created, before their invasion. 

In the bigger context of history, Africa has always been ahead of Europe. It is an  important affirmation of facts for younger people who have been misguided  by Eurocentric narratives. Numerous records and archaeological findings, historical  and academic references, prove the existence of highly developed African  civilizations forming the bedrock of current inventions across all sectors of our  current world advancement, including political, economic, medical, spiritual, and  educational systems. Walter Rodney (Guyanese author and activist) argues that  Africa had a path of development that was roughly parallel to Europe’s until the  Atlantic slave trade and that subsequent colonization forcibly diverted African raw  material and labor to drive European industrialization. In John Thornton’s Africa  and Africans in the Making of the Atlantic Worldhe provides a powerful argument 

that pre-colonial (i.e., ancient) African communities were militarily and politically  sophisticated. He highlights that initial interactions with Europeans were often on  African terms, with African rulers managing trade and diplomacy as equals or  superiors. (4). Heart of Darkness, published in 1899, centers on Joseph Conrad’s  fictional character, traveling up the Congo River, which he calls the Heart of Africa,  and concludes that this was indeed The Other World. Conrad uses Africa as a “place  of negations” or a “metaphysical battlefield,” a primitive space that completely  negates his perception of humanity. In the novel, he presents Africa as the direct  opposite of Europe, and projects the image of Africa as Achebe Chinua writes in  his review as the Other World; “the antithesis of Europe and therefore of  civilization, a place where a man’s vaunted intelligence and refinement are finally  mocked by triumphant bestiality. The book opens on the River Thames, tranquil,  resting peacefully “at the decline of day after ages of good service done to the race  that populated its banks. But the actual story takes place on the River Congo, the very  antithesis of the Thames. The River Congo is quite decidedly not a River Emeritus.  It has rendered no service and enjoys no old-age pension. We are told that “going up  that river was like traveling back to the earliest beginning of the world.” (5) 

1899 ‘Heart of Darkness’ and 2026 ‘Shithole Countries’ 

After the decolonization of Africa and the creation of 54 states, and 126 years after  The Heart of Darkness was published, these states are now being labelled as  ‘Shithole Countries’. The latter remark of targeting African countries clearly  echoes Conrad’s disdain by framing them as inferior and not fit to migrate to  Africa. Many liberal scholars of this century argue that while such attitudes are  expressed more subtly and the methods of control changed from physical chains to  economic dependence, the looting and exploitation of resources and the suppression  of black people at every opportunity are still there for every black man and woman  to see and experience in Europe and America. “Shithole” has even crossed the line  of subtle racism and added fuel, making it look like it is an accepted reference to  African countries. What they call the Global South ( Black Africa) has always been  considered as The Other World, treated under different standards, and held hostage  to its economic needs under a global, monetary and security order, territorial  partitions, under the Berlin Conference of 1884 (The Scramble for Africa) and the  Breton Woods Agreement signed in in July 1944 by 44 Allied nations (with no black  African Representations), United Nations Charter signed in June 24 1945, with only two African states, one ancient free country just liberated from Italian occupation  with support of allied forces (Ethiopia) and the other nominally independent but  under the colonial rule of the USA (Liberia). Under these arrangements, Africa has been  there for the taking since 1884. The continent copied political systems from  European countries. The system of government and the new global order introduced  a neo-colonial control, including economic and political interference, cultural  subjugation, and power imbalances. It also enabled foreign aid and trade,  multinational corporations, and international financial institutions to perpetuate  colonial policies. This truth has been established and echoed in the halls of the  United Nations and at all opportunities, told by most UN Secretaries General and  members of the UN of the contemporary world, who are now 193. Recently, the UN  Secretary-General António Guterres has argued that colonialism left a “poisoned  legacy” of institutionalized racism and white supremacy that still restricts the  potential of people of African descent. He stated in 2025 that “decolonization did  not free African countries… from the structures and prejudices.” (6) 

This is the concluding paragraph 

The best way for African democracies to secure their interests in a transactional  world is to trust each other more and present a more united face to the outside world:  they need to cooperate to exercise greater influence than any of them can  individually. Cooperation will also be the best way to secure as good a return for  their raw materials as possible, attract increased foreign investment, and build a local  market that will support a manufacturing base as a way of diversifying their  economies. Only in this way will they be able to respond to the demands at home  and resist the pressures from external powers abroad. As the African Transformation  Index from the Ghana-based think tank ACET indicates, many African countries still  need to establish the core economic foundations necessary for accelerated growth.  This needs good diplomacy as well as sound economic policies. Only by accelerating  integration and deepening cooperation can African countries turn today’s shifting  geopolitics into lasting autonomy and prosperity and secure a more influential place  in the global order. In its current shift, Africa should no longer be fighting for a seat  at a crowded, fragmented table; it must be capable of defining its own strategy by identifying the leverage needed to shape the global transformation. A continent that  strategically invests in its young populations today will define global innovation and  competitiveness tomorrow. The continent’s ultimate challenge is creating systems  that nurture leadership pipelines capable of converting demographic momentum into  sustained growth. This requires evolving the institutional power centers—both at  home and abroad—that were built for an era that no longer exists. In the emerging  world order where “might makes right” threatens to eclipse the rule of law, Africa  stands at a critical juncture. The continent can no longer afford to be a spectator in a  global landscape fragmented by great power competition and the erosion of  international norms. To move from the periphery to the center of global influence,  Africa must leverage its demographic and resource potential to demand a strategy  based on agency rather than dependency. 

This is part of a 21-page article. Full article available here:  https://www.africaisss.org/_files/ugd/bbb94b_ea7ad8726cae41558ae6917af5c6 7c0f.pdf”  

Editor’s Note : Views in the article do not necessarily reflect the views of borkena.com  

__

Join our Telegram Channel : t.me/borkena

To Support Borkena  : https://borkena.com/subscribe-borkena/ – one time support or small monthly options available. Inquire information about it : info@borkena.com

Like borkena on Facebook

To submit Press Release, send submission to info@borkena.com