Extraction impact
The Balaalo lost their grazing lands in a 2010 military operation and have been labelled ‘squatters’. As a multi-billion-dollar industry rises where they once roamed, they remain the only ones shut out of the promised economic transformation.
By Musinguzi Blanshe , Romain Gras
Published on April 28, 2026 at 06:00 am (GMT +1)Share
Enos Mubangizi remembers being woken at 5AM in December 2010, hearing hundreds of gun-wielding soldiers and police outside, rounding up cows from his family kraals and those of his neighbours.
Local pastor Stephen Mugisha, a respected pillar of his community, received a call just a day before from then-coordinator of Uganda’s national intelligence General David Sejusa. Sejusa informed the pastoralists that the Ugandan army was evicting all the families and their cows from their land.
“We were the only family in the area that had a bungalow, and it was demolished,” Mubangizi says, a member of the Balaalo pastoralists who also lost cows and land.
Code-named Justice, an estimated 640 families were forced out, and 20,000 head of cattle were taken. For Balaalo people, a nomadic pastoralist group spread out in the South, Western and Northern parts of Uganda, cows make up most of the family wealth.
The 20,000 cows were mixed together, and their owners could no longer identify them. A few managed to rescue their livestock but no longer had land to graze them.
READ MOREUganda’s Somalia bill: Who pays the ‘security dividend’?
The cows who were mixed in the big herd died from a lack of pasture and water. Others were sold off cheaply, sometimes for less than UGSh50,000 ($14).
Mugisha had set up a primary school and laid the foundation for what he envisioned as a mega church. He lost all of it.
Another pastor, Sam Tumwine, built a house that is now occupied by police.
“I wonder who the police are paying rent to,” he says. When contacted, the police refused our request for comment.
The parcels of land in Buliisa district targeted for eviction had become nationally significant – the site of oil discovery in 2006, and where much of the production infrastructure was installed – in a race to start extracting the country’s “black gold” by the end of 2026.
I would like to hear from the people themselves. To express that they have been positively impacted is not for us to decide
The new oil frontier turned neighbours into enemies – and the question remains whether anyone was held accountable for the devastating evictions.
Almost 15 years later, Mubangizi and the hundreds of other violently evicted herdsmen say they are still counting their losses and waiting for compensation.
Conflict over land and oil-era property claims
When oil was being surveyed by Tullow Oil, a multinational UK-headquartered oil and gas exploration company, Mugisha says they asked the geologists if their cows would be allowed to continue grazing, and they were reassured this was fine.
The conflict between pastoralists and the local community started in 2007, less than a year later. Oil discovery had an instant impact on the community: suddenly, people saw value in land and raced to transform it from a communal to an individual land tenure system.
As land values rose, disputes emerged over whether some sales of customary land were valid under local tenure arrangements.
READ MOREAfrican court dismisses activists’ case over TotalEnergies mega-project
At the time, Buliisa was an extremely rural community, whose life was still communal, including land ownership. Land possessed little value, costing about UGSh50,000 per acre at the time of Uganda’s confirmation of commercial oil discovery in 2006.
District chair Fred Lukumu said he regarded some transactions as invalid because, in his view, sellers lacked exclusive title.
“It was an illegal transaction because people were selling what did not exclusively belong to them,” Lukumu tells The Africa Report. “They were never verifying… just paying whoever told them land was theirs,” he adds.
Buliisa subcounty chairperson Kabagambe Kamanda doesn’t dispute the claim that pastoralists had bought land; rather how the acquisitions were documented and understood locally.
By 2003, the numerous pastoralists who had come to graze cattle had started buying land. Pastoralists said they had consulted community members who informed them that they had the right to purchase and own property.
We are now very poor. We didn’t know that until now a person could find himself with nothing
Kamanda claimed that some buyers took advantage of weak land documentation and low public awareness of land law; pastoralists dispute that account.
He claims that, in some cases, acreage recorded in sale paperwork did not match what sellers believed they had agreed to.
Frederick Watume, who was vice chairperson of Buliisa subcounty at the time, said some agreements brought to him lacked details he considered necessary, including acreage.
Though the herdsmen were trying to follow the law by ensuring that their land purchase agreements were stamped by local council leaders, the land purchase agreements brought to him for signing were defective.
“They would say, mukongolo (natives) sold land to such mulaalo (herdsmen), no acreage. Nothing,” he tells The Africa Report in an interview. “I warned them that in future, you’re going to lose this land.”
The local community says the herdsmen, who did not fence their cattle, were destroying crops. Lukumu says people were facing food shortages and the pastoralists would even beat natives trying to chase cows from their gardens.
Coming to Buliisa in the 1980s
The Balaalo herder families’ ordeal began in December 2010, but the story started 30 years before. The herders thought they found a happy ending in the Buliisa area after being evicted from government property that was later sold to Indian sugarcane growers.
READ MORETotalEnergies: Uganda’s mega oil project under scrutiny
Balaalo people who were looking for jobs in the 1980s had come to the Buliisa community to take care of cows, and would pay them with milk, says Bernard Barugahare, an elder from the village and former district community development officer.
“They [herdsmen] kept coming, increasing and in the process, they sold milk and started buying cows,” Barugahare tells The Africa Report. He says it was these herdsmen who invited their fellow tribesmen to come to Buliisa at the beginning of the 2000s. Pastor Mugisha reiterates that the invitation was extended by natives in the area.
Empty-handed, even after filing claims
From interviews with more than 40 people, including the pastoralists, local residents, local leaders, civil society members, oil was the main factor in the eviction of the Balaalo.
Local leaders in the area remember names of evicted herders well, but when asked directly about properties left behind, they give vague answers. They insist the pastoralists were compensated by the government and should not make any claims.
“Anybody who did not come back to claim property up to now has no moral authority to make a claim,” says Kamanda Kabagambe, the chairperson for Buliisa subcounty, whose office is less than two kilometres from Tumwine’s former home.
“Since 2011, I don’t think anyone would have failed to claim if there was any destruction that was not legal.”
READ MORE10 questions on Uganda’s controversial oil projects
A local journalist who covered the pastoralist-native conflicts between 2007 and 2010 describes it as “a terrible eviction” adding that “people lost everything”. Those journalist Stephen Kabindi followed up with in subsequent years were living with relatives for over a decade. “They will never be the same,” he says.
On X, General Sejusa indicated that this evacuation was carried out under orders from the Ugandan cabinet. He headed the security arm, while then-prime minister Apolo Nsibambi headed the overall task force.
“No property or life was lost,” he wrote.
Turning a blind eye?
The Tilenga project is operated by French petroleum giant TotalEnergies EP Uganda on behalf of a joint venture that includes the government of Uganda and state-owned China National Offshore Oil Company. TotalEnergies is the majority shareholder with 56.67% of the project.
The French oil company acquired a stake in Uganda’s oil project 14 months after the eviction. Since then, legal battles in Uganda have ensued as pastoralists seek justice which still evades them up to today. TotalEnergies maintains that the government responsibility is in the hands of the Ugandan authorities.
“Land acquisition has been implemented on behalf of the Government of Uganda under an approved framework aligned with national law and international standards,” François Sinecan, a press officer at TotalEnergies, tells The Africa Report.
“Challenges – such as absentee owners or overlapping claims – have been addressed through formal grievance channels and, if unresolved, referred to competent authorities,” he adds.
READ MOREWhy the relaunch of TotalEnergies’ activities in Africa is (still) behind schedule
Juliette Renaud, senior campaigner at Friends of the Earth France which sued TotalEnergies over rights violations in Uganda, tells The Africa Report that Total should have assessed more fully the human-rights risks associated with oil development in the region.https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/SzbGF/5/
“You can see these evictions in the oil region started before TotalEnergies came to Uganda and they didn’t do a proper risk assessment of the human rights violations that could be linked to the oil development,” she says.
Sinecan says all land acquisition for Tilenga follows rigorous due diligence under The Land Acquisition Resettlement Framework (LARF) and Resettlement Action Plans (RAPs).
‘Not interested in oil’
Politics too played a role in the eviction as local politicians warned the ruling party, including President Yoweri Museveni, of their waning popularity if they failed to evict the Balaalo pastoralists, who share a close connection to Museveni’s pastoralist Bahima community.
The eviction was executed just months before the 2011 general elections.
It was an illegal transaction because people were selling what did not exclusively belong to them
After the oil discovery, a suspicion ran through local crop farming communities – who made up a large majority of the residents – that the second wave of pastoralists, who arrived in the area at the turn of the century, had come to steal their oil.
“The politicians started spreading false information that we had occupied local people’s land that had oil,” Mugisha says, adding, “as [cattle] herders, we were not interested in oil.”
READ MORETotalEnergies: Environmentalists chain themselves to Parisian footbridge to halt EACOP
Stephen Biraahwa Mukitale, a former member of parliament of Buliisa county who played a central role in pushing the government to evict the pastoralists says he has never had a doubt that these pastoralists migrated to the area because they had prior knowledge about oil. He describes them as being fronts of powerful people who wanted to grab local peoples’ land.
“The locations where they went to in 2003, 2004 and 2005… the oil prospecting had started only to find out that all the oil wells and the pipeline as confirmed today are the very areas where these people had chosen to be,” Mukitale says, referring to the pastoralists.
In interviews, other politicians in the Buliisa community who rallied for the eviction used terminologies like, “maybe”, “we suspect,” “we believe” in arguing that the herdsmen had prior knowledge.
High court judgement, but still no relief
Although there was a push for the pastoralists to be evicted after oil was discovered in 2006, the Balaalo fought it in court for four years, halting the process.
In a 2013 high court judgment in a land case filed by the evicted pastoralists, Judge Ralph Ochan described their eviction as an “unlawful and a gross violation of rights” as provided for in Uganda’s constitution and other international instruments.
“The Balaalo were, on the evidence on record, violently and brutally evicted without any lawful orders of this or any other court,” wrote Judge Ochan.
In the judgment, he took note of public rhetoric and demagoguery by political leaders in Buliisa district that stoked up anti-Balaalo sentiments.
READ MOREBank of Uganda governor plays down oil windfall hype ahead of 2026 production
Ordering the return of the pastoralists to “land they acquired through lawful purchase would in all probability lead to grave social unrest”, according to Ochan.
These reporters were shown a land purchase agreement that the herdsmen had signed with the locals showing clear details of the land they had purchased and duly signed by all parties. It is part of the evidence that had been presented in court and that their lawyers continue to assert while seeking compensation.
The pastoralists reject the accusations of bad blood between them and the local communities, arguing that they had forged a good relationship.
“The locals loved us a lot, they never fought us. We were a united community. It’s politics that killed the good relationship and led to the eviction,” says pastoralist Mubangizi.
Forgotten in oil compensation
The process of assessing, valuing, and acquiring land for oil projects began around 2015, and compensation for pastoralists was left out of the equation.
While government officials who spoke with The Africa Report acknowledge the “pastoralists question”, they argue that their case happened long before the land acquisition and compensation process. They further claim that a rigorous, multi-layered process ensured that compensation money was given to the rightful owners.
“For us, this process didn’t look at the particularity of the Balaalo. It looked at ownership. The Balaalo issue was 2010; the compensation was for 2019/20,” Ali Ssekatawa, director of Legal and Corporate Affairs at the Petroleum Authority of Uganda (PAU), tells The Africa Report.
“If someone had been removed in 2010, is no longer on the ground, and there is no evidence, then there was no legal basis to be paid. If that person had a title that hadn’t been cancelled and was genuine, then that person was one of those who were paid,” he adds.
READ MORENigeria’s silent killer: Compensation to the communities
Uganda’s ministry of energy and mineral development, in a written response to The Africa Report, says the 2010 eviction of the Balaalo pastoralists was a complex issue rooted in long-standing land disputes between the pastoralists and indigenous communities. The ministry says it remains focused on its role of facilitating oil exploration and development within the broader government framework.
While the energy ministry described the eviction as a government decision based on court orders and efforts to address illegal occupation and escalating ethnic tensions, it acknowledges that it played a role in the process.
“The ministry supported the overarching government effort to enforce existing land laws and create an enabling environment for oil activities, while working with other relevant ministries to address the underlying land tenure issues. Our focus was on ensuring that any land acquired for oil development was done legally and with due process, within the context of these pre-existing disputes,” the ministry says.
Dispute over blame for abuses
Nicholas Opiyo, a human rights lawyer who documented the 2010 eviction, says oil companies, under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, have an obligation to ensure their investments do not lead to the abuse of affected communities’ rights.
Opiyo says oil companies benefitting from the project should bear a share of responsibility for harms suffered by affected communities.
“It’s clear that Total, Tullow and other companies hid behind the government to avoid responsibility, in some cases subcontracting their roles to private companies,” Opiyo tells The Africa Report. “They owe a duty of reparation and restitution to those communities. They can’t run away from those obligations.”
READ MORESilent killer: The deadly price of oil
A spokesperson for Tullow said the company “operates in strict accordance with all applicable international laws and regulations” and always seeks to “uphold the highest standards of ethical conduct and respect for human rights” in all its operations.
At a May 2025 conference that brought together civil society organisations, oil companies and government officials to discuss social and human rights issues in Uganda’s oil and gas sector, TotalEnergies EP Uganda General Manager Philippe Groueix said the Uganda project has become the most scrutinised project in the world.
“I would like to hear from the people themselves. To express that they have been positively impacted is not for us to decide, it’s up to them to share that their life today is better than before, and better than it would have been without the project,” Groueix said.
In a 2020 study, the World Bank estimated that Uganda could earn $800m per year, becoming a linchpin for economic transformation. But for the forgotten pastoralists, they believe that their future is doomed because of the oil.
When we arrived at the home of Mugisha on a sweltering afternoon, he was reluctant to revisit the ordeal his community had endured over the past 15 years as they sought justice. He thought speaking to strangers was pointless, as it would not bring a resolution.
Eventually, he spoke. For nearly an hour, he recounted what the eviction had meant for them, their immense losses and the suffering they have endured since.
“We are now very poor. We didn’t know that until now a person could find himself with nothing,” he said.
This article was made possible with funding from Journalism Fund Europe
- Musinguzi Blanshe
- Romain Gras