May 21, 2026
A Review of Habte H.’s piece..
By Emedo Farda
Ethiopia occupies a unique position in African history — the only sub-Saharan country never colonized, a civilization thousands of years old, a nation whose very name has carried symbolic weight across the continent and the diaspora. When Abiy Ahmed Ali came to power in April 2018, inheriting leadership of Africa’s second most populous country, many Ethiopians and international observers believed they were witnessing a rare inflection point: a young, charismatic leader capable of steering a deeply complex nation toward genuine transformation. Eight years later, the assessment of his tenure is fiercely contested, emotionally charged, and — perhaps most importantly — far more complicated than either his admirers or his harshest critics allow.
Habte H.’s recent opinion piece captures much of the legitimate frustration that millions of Ethiopians feel. Its moral energy is real, its grievances are grounded in genuine suffering, and several of its core factual claims are well supported by evidence. Yet the essay also illustrates a recurring danger in political commentary on Ethiopia — the temptation to collapse a profoundly complex leadership story into a simple psychological portrait, substituting speculation for analysis and passion for precision. A more complete and ultimately more useful accounting requires holding both the documented failures and the verified achievements in honest tension, without surrendering to the seductive simplicity of either uncritical praise or unrelenting condemnation.
What the Evidence Supports: Legitimate Criticisms
The most serious charge against Abiy Ahmed’s government concerns the Tigray War, which began in November 2020 and lasted until a ceasefire agreement in November 2022. This was not a matter of political interpretation or competing narratives. The conflict produced one of the worst humanitarian catastrophes of the twenty-first century. Credible estimates from researchers at Ghent University and other institutions suggest that between 300,000 and 500,000 people died — from direct violence, starvation, and disease — making it one of the deadliest conflicts globally since the Rwandan genocide. Millions were displaced. Atrocities were documented on multiple sides, including by United Nations investigators and human rights organizations. The use of starvation as a weapon of war was reported and credibly documented. The scale of suffering was catastrophic, and it occurred under the watch of a sitting Nobel Peace Prize laureate.
That irony is not merely symbolic. The Nobel Committee awarded Abiy the Peace Prize in 2019 specifically for ending the decades-long state of war with Eritrea and for his early political reforms. Less than two years later, his government was engaged in a war involving Eritrean troops fighting inside Ethiopian territory against Ethiopian citizens. Whatever the political justifications advanced by Addis Ababa, the distance between the Nobel citation and the subsequent reality was staggering.
Beyond Tigray, conflict did not end with the 2022 ceasefire. Fighting continued in the Amhara region beginning in 2023, with the government deploying military force and drone strikes against Amhara Fano fighters — a situation that further complicated any narrative of post-conflict national healing. Oromia has also remained a zone of persistent violence, with ongoing confrontations between government forces and the Oromo Liberation Army. The picture across Ethiopia’s regions is not one of a country at peace.
Economically, the evidence of hardship is also substantial. Ethiopia’s inflation has been severe, eroding household purchasing power significantly. The Ethiopian birr has lost considerable value. Youth unemployment remains structurally high, and the brain drain — the emigration of educated Ethiopians seeking opportunity abroad — is widely documented and increasingly a matter of open national concern. Infrastructure investments, while real, have not translated into the kind of broad-based economic opportunity that a young and rapidly growing population requires.
Concerns about institutional concentration of power are equally well-founded. The consolidation of regional governance, the weakening of independent institutions, restrictions on press freedom, and the detention of journalists and opposition figures have been documented by credible organizations including Reporters Without Borders, Committee to Protect Journalists, and Human Rights Watch. These are structural governance concerns, not mere opposition talking points.
What the Evidence Also Shows: Verified Achievements
A balanced account, however, cannot stop there.
When Abiy came to power in 2018, he inherited a country already deeply fractured. The EPRDF — the ruling coalition that had governed Ethiopia since 1991 — had presided over decades of political repression, arbitrary detention, torture in places like Maekelawi prison, and systematic exclusion of political opponents. Ethiopia was an authoritarian developmental state, and while it achieved real economic growth, it did so through systems that denied citizens fundamental rights and suppressed political expression through force.
Abiy’s first year brought genuinely significant reforms. Thousands of political prisoners were released — including prominent figures such as journalist Eskinder Nega, Oromo Federalist Congress leader Merera Gudina, and many others who had spent years behind bars. Exiled opposition groups and armed movements, including the Oromo Liberation Front, were invited to return and participate in politics. Independent media was briefly able to operate more freely. The state of emergency was lifted. These were real and meaningful changes, and they were welcomed across the political spectrum.
The Eritrea peace deal, whatever its subsequent complications, was a genuine diplomatic breakthrough. The “no war, no peace” stalemate between Ethiopia and Eritrea had lasted twenty years, costing both countries enormously in military expenditure, economic isolation, and human toll. Abiy and Eritrean President Isaias Afwerki signed a joint declaration of peace in July 2018, reopening borders, restoring diplomatic relations, and allowing separated families to reconnect. That achievement was real, regardless of how subsequent events unfolded.
Ethiopia has also made measurable progress in certain areas of infrastructure and electricity generation. The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), while enormously controversial diplomatically with Egypt and Sudan, represents a significant national project that, when fully operational, promises to dramatically expand Ethiopia’s electricity generation capacity — a genuine development priority for a country where large portions of the population lack reliable power. The dam was not Abiy’s initiation, but its continued progress under his administration is a documented fact.
Tree-planting initiatives, whatever their precise verification challenges, reflected genuine national mobilization and generated significant international attention. Some development economists have noted that while urban beautification projects attract legitimate criticism for misaligned priorities, certain infrastructure investments do contribute to long-term economic foundations.
Where the piece Overreaches: The Problem of Psychological Speculation
This is where Habte H.’s essay, despite its factual grounding on key points, loses analytical credibility. The essay repeatedly moves from documented policy outcomes to speculative psychological diagnosis. It describes Abiy as governed by “psychological impulses shaped by personal insecurity, emotional politics, and performative ambition.” It suggests he belongs to the category of leaders who “emerge with deep resentment, insecurity, and a desire to prove themselves through grand displays of power.” It states he “appears obsessed with symbolic projects” and implies that his humble origins have produced resentment rather than wisdom.
These are not analytical observations. They are clinical-sounding characterizations presented without clinical evidence. No psychologist has evaluated Abiy Ahmed. No documented internal deliberations reveal that insecurity drives his policy choices. His childhood poverty is cited as the explanation for what the author believes are adult failures — a form of pop-psychology determinism that would be challenged in any rigorous academic setting.
This matters for several reasons.
First, it is intellectually dishonest. Framing policy disagreements as psychological pathology forecloses the possibility that Abiy and his government might hold coherent, if contested, strategic views. Reasonable people can disagree about whether prioritizing certain infrastructure projects over others reflects vanity or a calculated development theory. Attributing the choice to personal insecurity rather than a policy framework — even a flawed one — shuts down analysis before it begins.
Second, it weakens the critique precisely where the critique is most needed. When genuine and serious failures — the Tigray War, economic mismanagement, democratic backsliding — are bundled together with psychological speculation, skeptical readers have grounds to dismiss the entire argument. A piece that argued from evidence alone would be far harder to deflect.
Third, the psychological framing reflects a pattern common in political commentary across the African continent and beyond, where leaders who disappoint are rapidly transformed from complex political actors into moral and psychological case studies. This flattening deserves not only accuracy but also the citizens whose lived realities deserve precise political analysis rather than emotionally satisfying caricature.
The essay also makes the further claim that Abiy may “genuinely believe he is succeeding” because he is so politically isolated that “controlled narratives” have replaced reality. This is possible. It is also possible that Abiy’s public confidence reflects a genuinely different strategic assessment of Ethiopia’s trajectory. Or political performance. Or both. The essay offers no method for distinguishing between these possibilities, because it has already resolved the question through psychological assumption.
What a More Complete Picture Requires
Ethiopia’s situation demands analysis that refuses comfortable simplification in either direction.
The failures under Abiy Ahmed are real, documented, and consequential. The Tigray catastrophe alone would be sufficient to constitute a profound governance failure by any serious measure. The continuation of conflict in Amhara and Oromo regions , the economic hardship facing ordinary Ethiopians, the constraints on democratic freedoms, the narrowing of political space — all of these represent serious and legitimate concerns that deserve sustained attention and accountability.
At the same time, the challenges PM Abiy inherited were not created by him. Ethiopia’s ethnic federalism architecture, designed in the early 1990s, built political mobilization along ethnic lines in ways that created structural incentives for conflict. The TPLF — which dominated Ethiopian politics for nearly three decades — governed through systems of repression and regional economic favoritism that generated enormous resentment. The country’s institutional capacity was limited, its civil service politicized, and its security sector fragmented. None of this excuses subsequent decisions, but it provides necessary context for understanding why governing Ethiopia is genuinely difficult, and why attributing all failures to a single leader’s psychology is insufficient.
The generation Habte H. writes about — Ethiopia’s young, globally connected, technologically ambitious youth — does indeed deserve the things the essay describes: peace, quality education, economic opportunity, freedom of thought, and institutions that reward merit over political loyalty. These are not utopian aspirations; they are reasonable expectations that every functioning state owes its citizens. The question of whether and how Ethiopia moves toward them is one of the most important political questions in the Horn of Africa.
But that question will be better answered by analysis grounded in evidence, structural assessment, and honest acknowledgment of complexity than by psychological portraits, however emotionally resonant.
Abiy Ahmed’s tenure represents one of the most consequential and contested chapters in modern Ethiopian history. The Nobel Peace Prize winner who presided over one of the century’s worst humanitarian disasters; the reformer who freed political prisoners and later imprisoned journalists; the Pan-Africanist who spoke of unity while war consumed his own people — these contradictions are real, and they deserve unflinching examination.
Habte H. ‘s piece gives voice to a legitimate and widespread frustration. Its passion reflects genuine suffering, and many of its factual anchors are solid. But the work of honest political accountability requires more than passion. It requires the discipline to distinguish documented failure from psychological speculation, to acknowledge genuine achievement alongside genuine catastrophe, and to resist the temptation to transform a complex political figure into a psychological archetype.
Ethiopia’s future — the one that millions of its people, young and old, still hope for — will be built through exactly the qualities the essay rightly praises: intellectual honesty, strategic clarity, and the courage to see things as they are, not simply as our emotions demand.That standard applies not only to the leaders being assessed. It applies equally to those doing the assessing.
This piece is an independent analytical response to “Abiy Ahmed’s Visionary Claims and Ethiopia’s Harsh Reality” by Habte H.
…
Editor’s Note : Views in the article do not necessarily reflect the views of borkena.com
__
Join our Telegram Channel : t.me/borkena
Like borkena on Facebook
To submit Press Release, send submission to info@borkena.com
Add your business to Ethiopian Business Listing / Ethiopian Business Directory
Join the conversation. Follow us on X (Formerly Twitter) @zborkenato get the latest Ethiopian News updates regularly.
To Support Borkena : https://borkena.com/subscribe-borkena/ – one time support or small monthly options available. Inquire information about it : info@borkena.com