June 24, 2026
By: Habte H.
Few callings in the Christian world are as sacred and demanding as monastic life. In the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church (EOTC), monks are traditionally regarded as spiritual athletes – individuals who voluntarily leave behind wealth, family, status, and worldly ambitions in pursuit of a deeper relationship with God. Their lives are intended to be marked by prayer, fasting, humility, obedience, and separation from worldly affairs. For centuries, monasteries have been among the Church’s greatest treasures. They preserved faith during times of crisis, nurtured saints, protected sacred manuscripts, and served as centers of spiritual renewal. The strength of monasticism has never come from wealth or influence. It has come from sacrifice.
When Monasticism Leaves the Monastery
This is why the growing presence of monks in urban centers raises an important question. The issue should not be whether monks should return to monasteries. The real question is why such a return has become controversial in the first place.
A monk’s vocation is inseparable from the monastery. The monastery is not simply a residence; it is a spiritual environment designed to cultivate discipline, prayer, and detachment from worldly concerns. A monk outside the monastery is like a fish outside water – removed from the very conditions that give meaning to his calling.
A useful metaphor can be found in the stray dogs that populate many Ethiopian cities. A dog has a natural purpose: guarding homes, protecting livestock, alerting communities to danger, and providing security. When dogs remain where they belong, they serve a clear function and are valued for it. But when large numbers become detached from that role and roam urban centers, they often become little more than a source of noise, disorder, and nuisance. The issue is not that dogs are bad; it is that they are no longer fulfilling the purpose for which they are valued.
The same principle can be applied to monastic life. The strength of a monk comes from the monastery – its discipline, prayer, and spiritual environment. When monasticism becomes detached from that setting, it risks losing the very qualities that make it spiritually powerful. Addis Ababa today offers a visible illustration of both phenomena: cities filled with stray dogs and increasingly populated by monks whose calling was never intended to be centered in urban life.
Yet today, many believers observe a growing disconnect between the ideals of monastic life and the realities of urban monasticism. In cities, some monks appear increasingly integrated into social, economic, and administrative structures that stand in tension with the traditional monastic vocation. Whether these concerns are widespread or limited to particular cases, the perception itself deserves serious reflection.
The Cost of Blurring Spiritual Boundaries
The city is full of distractions, temptations, political conflicts, financial interests, and social pressures. Monastic life was never designed to flourish under such conditions. Throughout Christian history, monastic movements have weakened whenever they became too closely attached to worldly power, comfort, or influence. The issue is therefore not merely about location. It is about identity.
When the distinction between monastic life and ordinary life becomes blurred, the Church risks weakening one of its most important spiritual institutions. Monasteries lose their purpose when they become symbolic rather than lived realities. The Church loses a vital source of spiritual authority when monasticism becomes indistinguishable from ordinary social life.
Many believers increasingly worry that urban monasticism has contributed to administrative conflicts, weakened discipline, and declining public trust. Whether these concerns are fully justified or not, they point to a deeper question: can monasticism remain authentic when detached from the environment that gave it meaning?
Could Two Reforms Solve Half of the Church’s Problems?
The EOTC today faces many challenges – administrative problems, governance concerns, internal divisions, declining trust, and growing frustration among believers. Yet it is possible that a significant share of these problems stems from deeper structural and spiritual issues. If that is true, then meaningful reform may not require dozens of new policies, committees, or regulations. It may require the courage to make two fundamental decisions.
The first is restoring monasticism to its original purpose by encouraging urban monks to return to monasteries and live according to the spiritual discipline that defines their vocation. Monasticism derives its strength from separation from worldly affairs, not participation in them.
The second is strengthening the spiritual independence of bishops by reducing their dependence on salaries and administrative structures. Historically, bishops were respected not because of institutional authority alone, but because of their spiritual authority, moral example, and relative freedom from material interests. The closer Church leadership becomes too bureaucratic and financial concerns, the greater the risk that spiritual leadership is weakened. One could reasonably argue that these two reforms alone might address a substantial proportion of the governance, credibility, and disciplinary challenges confronting the Church today.
Protecting Monasticism by Returning to Its Roots
Calls for monks to return to monasteries should not be interpreted as criticism of monasticism. On the contrary, they should be understood as an effort to protect it. The purpose of monastic life was never comfort, visibility, or influence. It was a sacrifice. The monastery exists to create the conditions necessary for spiritual transformation. When monks remain rooted in that environment, they strengthen not only themselves but also the entire Church. If some individuals feel called to live permanently in cities and participate fully in public life, there is nothing dishonorable about serving as clergy or as faithful citizens. But monasticism carries a unique calling and unique obligations. Preserving that distinction is essential for the health of the Church.
The Future of the Church Depends on Spiritual Integrity
The future strength of the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church will not be determined primarily by its buildings, finances, or administrative structures. It will be determined by the strength of its spiritual institutions and the integrity of those entrusted with them. The Church has survived wars, invasions, political upheavals, and social transformation because it remained anchored in spiritual foundations. Among those foundations, few are more important than monasticism. The question before the Church is therefore simple: Should monasticism adapt itself to the city, or should the Church preserve the monastic tradition that has sustained it for centuries? The answer may shape not only the future of monasteries, but the future of the Church itself.
Editor’s Note: Views in the article do not necessarily reflect the views of borkena.com
__
Join our Telegram Channel: t.me/borkena
Like borkena on Facebook
To submit a press release, send the submission to info@borkena.com
Add your business to Ethiopian Business Listing / Ethiopian Business Directory
Join the conversation. Follow us on X (formerly Twitter) @zborkena to get the latest Ethiopian news updates regularly.