July 22, 2026
Editor’s Note: Views in the article do not necessarily reflect the views of borkena.com
By Eng. Abdi Ali Barkad
Hargeisa, Somaliland
There is a growing belief among many political and economic observers that, for more than fifty years, a major objective of U.S. policy in the Middle East has been linked to the destruction and reconstruction cycle of strategic infrastructure, particularly oil refineries, energy facilities, and other critical national assets in the region.
According to this view, any large-scale conflict involving Iran could lead to retaliatory attacks against the infrastructure of the Gulf States, resulting in enormous economic losses throughout the region. The argument is that once such destruction occurs, a massive reconstruction effort would follow, creating contracts worth billions of dollars for international companies.
Many analysts describe this as a “Tom and Jerry game,” where continuous tensions and conflicts create opportunities for reconstruction projects. However, the Arab countries of today are not the same as they were decades ago. The geopolitical and economic landscape has changed significantly, and new global powers now play major roles in rebuilding and infrastructure development.
Critics argue that failed American policies in the Middle East could ultimately damage the interests of the American people themselves. They point out that countries such as China, members of the European Union, UK and Turkey have become increasingly active in financing and carrying out infrastructure and development projects across the region.
Some political and economic experts believe that President Donald Trump’s approach to regional conflicts was influenced by economic considerations, including the potential benefits that could arise from reconstruction contracts in Gulf countries and Jordan. They argue that large corporations and business groups connected to reconstruction projects often stand to gain financially from post-conflict rebuilding efforts.
At the same time, many people believe that the United States has lost a significant amount of goodwill in the Middle East and Africa compared to the period between the 1960s and 1970s, when America was widely admired in many parts of the world. As someone who (Author) was educated by American Peace Corps teachers, I personally remember a time when the United States was viewed much more positively. In my opinion, America should return to the values of peace, development, education, and international cooperation that once earned it widespread respect.
The ongoing conflicts in the Middle East should end as quickly as possible. Continued warfare only increases human suffering, economic hardship, and regional instability.
Historically, the United States benefited from strong partnerships with the United Kingdom and European allies. Today, however, disagreements among Western allies have become more visible. Some observers argue that these divisions have weakened America’s global influence and contributed to policy challenges in different regions of the world.
Peace, stability, and economic cooperation remain the most effective path toward prosperity for the peoples of the Middle East and for the international community.
A Message to the American People
A strong America is not measured solely by its military power, but also by its ability to inspire trust, promote stability, and build partnerships around the world. The true strength of America comes from its values, innovation, education, humanitarian contributions, and its ability to lead through cooperation rather than confrontation.
Today, many Americans are increasingly questioning the cost of prolonged wars and military interventions. A significant number of citizens believe that national resources should focus more on domestic priorities such as infrastructure, education, healthcare, economic development, and improving the quality of life for ordinary Americans.
Public confidence in President Donald Trump has also faced challenges, with several recent polls showing approval levels below a majority and, in some surveys, close to the 30–40% range. (Pew Research Center) This reflects growing debate among Americans about foreign policy decisions, the direction of the country, and the consequences of continued international conflicts.
The American people should carefully examine the long-term impact of war and instability. Military strength can protect a nation, but endless conflict can also weaken economies, damage international relationships, and reduce global trust.
America was once admired in many parts of the world for its commitment to education, science, development, and humanitarian assistance. Programs such as the American Peace Corps created strong connections between ordinary Americans and people around the globe. Restoring that spirit of cooperation would strengthen America’s influence more than military actions alone.
The future prosperity of both America and the international community depends on choosing cooperation over confrontation, diplomacy over escalation, and peace over perpetual war.
The American people have an important role in shaping the future direction of their country. A peaceful and respected America will always be stronger than an America defined only by its military power.
Engineer Abdi Ali Barkhad is a senior consultant, and independent political analyst. He is well known for his detailed commentary, analytical articles, and essays focusing on international relations and the complex geopolitics of the Horn of Africa
Editor’s Note: Views in the article do not necessarily reflect the views of borkena.com
__
Join our Telegram Channel: t.me/borkena
Like borkena on Facebook
To submit a press release, send the submission to info@borkena.com